Leading climate scientists have voiced strong objections to how their findings were portrayed in the recent government-issued climate assessment. According to multiple experts involved in the original studies, key data points were altered or selectively presented to downplay the urgency of environmental degradation and its projected impacts. This accusation raises troubling questions about transparency and scientific integrity in policy-advisory processes, as the report plays a crucial role in shaping national climate strategies and funding priorities.

Experts highlighted several specific areas of concern, including:

  • Temperature projections: The report reportedly omits extreme warming scenarios that many peer-reviewed studies predict.
  • Emission timelines: Alterations in the…